Prediction of Sarah Loosemore vs Gaby Coorengel Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Loosemore vs G. Coorengel

Sarah Loosemore

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

229

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Gaby Coorengel

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

229

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Loosemore 1 - 0 Coorengel

They have played 2 sets in total, with Sarah Loosemore winning 2 and Gaby Coorengel winning 0. The last match between Sarah Loosemore and Gaby Coorengel was at the ITF Katowice, 21-05-1990, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Sarah Loosemore getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Loosemore	1
Coorengel	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) ITF Katowice(05-21-90)

Stats

Sarah Loosemore

Gaby Coorengel

S. Loosemore vs G. Coorengel H2H Profile

S. Loosemore	Stats	G. Coorengel
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
48.00% (60-65)	Career Total W/L	58.33% (91-65)
1	Clay	0
1	Titles	4
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. Loosemore vs G. Coorengel Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sarah Loosemore has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Gaby Coorengel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sarah Loosemore, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gaby Coorengel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Sarah Loosemore has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gaby Coorengel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Sarah Loosemore has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Gaby Coorengel winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Sarah Loosemore has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 43/29), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 11% (W/L 1/8). Gaby Coorengel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 16/11), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 33% (W/L 1/2).
Player level: In the last year, Sarah Loosemore has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Gaby Coorengel has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sarah Loosemore winning 1 times and Gaby Coorengel being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sarah Loosemore winning 2 and Gaby Coorengel winning 0.
The last match between Sarah Loosemore and Gaby Coorengel was at the ITF Katowice, 21-05-1990, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Sarah Loosemore getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sarah Loosemore has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Gaby Coorengel has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sarah Loosemore has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gaby Coorengel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Sarah Loosemore has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gaby Coorengel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Sarah Loosemore vs Gaby Coorengel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. Loosemore vs G. Coorengel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. Loosemore	Stats	G. Coorengel
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	7
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

S. Loosemore Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
US Open - 31-08-1992
Q1 Jolene WatanabeJ. Watanabe	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 24-08-1992
Q1 Camille BenjaminC. Benjamin	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Toronto - 17-08-1992
Q2 Clare WoodC. Wood	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
Q1 Ilana BergerI. Berger	W	6-2 3-6 6-1	Stats
ITF York - 10-08-1992
R3 Tatiana IgnatievaT. Ignatieva	L	6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

G. Coorengel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Brest 25K - 21-03-1994
R3 Sarah Pitkowski MalcorS. Pitkowski	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
ITF Reims 25K - 14-03-1994
R3 Catherine Mothes JobkelC. Mothes	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
ITF Prostejov 25K - 07-03-1994
R3 Pavlina RajzlovaP. Rajzlova	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
ITF Newcastle 25K - 14-02-1994
R3 Sylvia PlischkeS. Plischke	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
R4 Joanne WardJ. Ward	L	5-7 6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

S. Loosemore vs G. Coorengel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. Loosemore	Stats	G. Coorengel
48.00% (60/65)	YTD Win/Loss	58.33% (91/65)
47.57% (137/151)	Sets Win/Loss	56.30% (201/156)
49.26% (1296/1335)	Games Win/Loss	53.91% (1771/1514)
59.72% (43/29)	Hard Win/Loss	59.26% (16/11)
18.18% (2/9)	Clay Win/Loss	52.24% (35/32)
22.22% (2/7)	Indoor Hard W/L	66.10% (39/20)
11.11% (1/8)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
33.33% (2/4)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
66.67% (2/1)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
52.94% (9/8)	Challenger W/L	62.70% (79/47)
50.00% (12/12)	Futures W/L	33.33% (1/2)
48% (59/123)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	58% (90/154)
36% (4/11)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	43% (12/28)
54% (22/41)	Deciding Set Win %	58% (28/48)
88% (49/43)	1st Set Won, Won Match	92% (87/80)
12% (49/6)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	8% (87/7)
21% (75/16)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (68/11)